The West African Journal was a major magazine publication in the United States with a focus on the Mano River region and West Africa sub-region during the civil crises in Liberia and neighboring countries during the decades of the 1990s.
This was the period when many citizens and others in the sub-region were fleeing their homeland due to conflicts, and the magazine was a reliable source of information covering developments in the region and in the Diaspora. However, the magazine suspended publication several years ago but is now back.
It is, therefore, delightful that The West African Journal has been reactivated. The print edition of the magazine, to be published monthly and distributed in the United States, West Africa, and other parts of the world, will provide analysis of the major events of the period under review.
Due to challenges relating to availability of reading materials in the sub-region, a few hundred copies of every edition of the magazine will be distributed free of charge to libraries and reading rooms at schools and institutions of higher learning in the sub-West Africa sub-region.
The Journal covers government/politics, economics/international trade/investment and partnerships, women's issues, showcase of tourism and historic attractions in West Africa in particular, and Africa in general, as well as cover the Diaspora, entrepreneurship, among others.
The Journal also taps into growing interest in the Unites States regarding resource-rich Africa as the next frontier for global economic progress amid an increasing global competition for access to the continent’s abundant natural resources. The magazine will regularly cover bilateral and multilateral partnerships between the US/multinational agencies and Africa/individual African countries.
More importantly, in considering the danger of Climate Change and Global Warming, The Journal serves as a strong and unrelenting advocate to create international awareness regarding Climate Change, especially how West African countries and the African Continent as a whole are being negatively impacted. Through its environmental coverage, The Journal promotes education and awareness for people to be empowered.
Our experienced team of editors, reporters and feature writers are excited to bring the stories that impact politics, finance, economy, arts, health, education, climate change, women and youth issues in Africa today.
The West African Journal is registered and published in Washington, D.C., U.S.A. Plans are underway to open a bureau office in Liberia, from which operations in other West African countries will be coordinated.
Our journalists, who bring decades of high engagement of news and reportage, include former BBC veteran correspondent Isaac D.E. Bantu, former Daily Observer Features Editor and publisher of the West African Journal Joe S. Kappia, and Pana Press Editor Tepitapia K. Sannah, and respected Photo journalist and editor Gregory Stemn.
These experienced and internationally-respected journalists ensure a high standard of professional journalism.
Information and inquiries for The West African Journal should be directed to the following:
Editor-in-Chief; Email: WestAfricanJournalMagazine@gmail.com
Isaac D.E. Bantu: Publishing Partner; Email: WestAfricanJournalMagazine@gmail.com
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 55053, Washington, D.C. 20040-5053 USA
Philadelphia, PA USA – Reports from the Liberian capital Monrovia say four political parties in the small West African nation have been holding “merger talks” in order to support incumbent Vice President Joseph Boakai against his Presidential challenger and leader of the Coalition for Democratic Change (CDC) Senator George Weah.
According to a senior source with knowledge of the matter, the merger discussion took place Tuesday, November 7th, the same day planned for run off elections between the two contenders who are hoping to succeed President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf who is stepping down after two full terms.
The talks include the Liberty Party(LP) led by Senator Charles Walker Brumskine whose party filed a petitition with the country’s highest court complaining of “fraud and irregularities” in the October 10th Presidential and General Elections and to stop the run- off elections between incumbent Vice President Joseph Boakai of the ruling Unity Party (UP) and Senator George Weah of the CDC.
According to party Chairman of the ruling UP Mr. Robert Kpadeh, ” …What you see today is a strong signal to the world that they are coming together to fight for democracy.”We strongly believe that Weah cannot run this country.”
The UP official did not definitely state who the four political parties are that are holding “merger talks.”
The Liberian Supreme Court has come under criticism for halting the run-off elections’; a situation which could potentially lead to a constitutional crisis, if a new date is not set for the run-off elections and the inauguration of a new President when incumbent President Johnson Sirleaf’s term ends in January. The Supreme Court issued a ruling on Monday which effectively halted the run-off elections and instructed the National Elections to expeditiously handle the complaint of the Liberty Party before a new run-off date can be set.
Vice President Joseph Boakai, the candidate of the ruling Party told the AFP, “I had doubts the NEC was competent enough to administer an election that would be free, fair and transparent.” The party itself has accused President Johnson-Sirleaf of interference in the electoral process.
The Unity Party and Alternative National Congress (ANC) have thrown their support behind the Liberty Party’s petition which cites irregularities and fraud.
The emergence of a new coalition front involving the ruling party and other political against parties portends political uncertainty for the immediate future in Liberia including speculation of the installation of an interim government. No political party has so far warmed to the idea of an interim mechanism, citing constitutional succession guarantees.
The CDC says it is concerned that a political crisis could erupt if the Supreme Court annuls the result of the October 10th elections. “We are concerned about attempts by certain members of the Supreme Court’s bench to mis- or wrongfully interpret our constitution, with the view of now creating a constitutional crisis,” CDC Chairman Nathaniel McGill told Bloomberg News by phone. “The election should proceed, that’s what we hope for.”
ROME — In a rather tragic circumstance, it is being reported that the bodies of 26 young Nigerian women and girls have been retrieved from the Mediterranean Sea over the weekend and taken to Italy.
According to the New York Times , officials have launched an investigation into how the young Nigerian women died.
A official in the port city of Salerno says, “It is a tragedy for mankind.” He says local prosecutors will start work quickly to determine if the deaths were homicides. The bodies of the deceased and nearly 400 migrants who were also rescued from the Mediterranean Sea were taken to Salerno.
Marco Rotunno, the communications officer for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Italy estimates that the young women were between the ages of 14 and 18.
According to the New York Times report, the bodies were found floating in the water by the Spanish Navy on Nov. 3, and survivors on nearby rubber dinghies, which had partly capsized, told the authorities that they were Nigerian and had departed from Libya.
No one has claimed any of the bodies and it is still unknown if any of the surviving migrants are related.
Hundreds of Africans make the perilous journey through north Africa, especially Libya, to Europe in search of a better life. European navy officials say they have seen an increase in migrants in the last few years but with tragic results too.
Meantime, latest reports now say 2 arrests have been made. Al Mabrouc Wisam Harar from Libya and Mohammed Ali Al Bouzid from Egypt were arrested later on Tuesday.
The were captains of the boat on which the nearly 400 migrants were crammed.
Despite the historically low-priority status of sub-Saharan Africa to the U.S. military, the U.S. security focus on the region will continue to grow given the systemic weaknesses that militant groups exploit there.
The use of a light footprint strategy — including special operations forces, drones, and cooperation with local partners and allies such as France — will enable the United States to project force at minimal cost.
Although President Donald Trump’s administration opposes funding multinational efforts such as U.N. peacekeeping missions, the U.S. military will continue to emphasize local partnerships with nations in sub-Saharan Africa.
Sub-Saharan Africa has long been a low priority for the United States. Since taking office in January, U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration has confirmed that status, cutting foreign aid budgets that disproportionately affect Africa and turning its focus to other issues and areas. Yet events in recent weeks have magnified the region’s prominence in U.S. foreign policy. On Sept. 24, for example, the Trump administration added Chadian nationals to the list of people facing travel restrictions. Four U.S. service members died in Niger the following week during a mission with local troops. Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, recently visited Ethiopia, South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. And on Oct. 20, U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis reportedly told senior members of the Senate Armed Services Committee that the military would increase its counterterrorism activities in sub-Saharan Africa, loosen rules of engagement and give commanders in the field more decision-making power. Despite the Trump administration’s actions, the region now appears to be receiving more attention from U.S. policy-makers.
A Rising Security Priority
U.S. military investment in sub-Saharan Africa has been quietly growing for years. This October, in fact, marked the 10th anniversary of the establishment of the U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM), one of nine unified combatant commands. The continent has been a key testing ground for the U.S. military’s “small footprint” strategy, which emphasizes partnerships with local forces and cooperation with allies such as France. The strategy also stresses the role of special operations forces, drones and training facilities known as Cooperative Security Locations or “lily pads” in an effort to avoid the perception of an overbearing, neocolonial U.S. military presence. (Washington tried to establish a permanent headquarters on the continent when it first rolled out AFRICOM but moved its main offices to Germany after populations and governments in Africa pushed back against the idea.)
As the U.S. military’s interest in sub-Saharan Africa has grown, its priorities in the region have shifted. The United States initially focused on East Africa — and particularly on the fight against the al-Qaeda affiliated militant group al Shabaab. In Somalia, U.S. military trainers have provided extensive assistance to the Somali army and to the multinational African Union Mission in Somalia, or AMISOM. But over the past several years, West Africa has started drawing more of the United States’ attention. The chaos that consumed Libya after the fall of longtime leader Moammar Gadhafi in 2011 spilled over into nearby Mali, along with militants and weapons. In 2013, an offensive from allied jihadist and Tuareg nationalist forces prompted France to intervene to bolster the Malian army and keep the West African country from collapse, with considerable logistical support from the U.S. military. The incident opened the Pentagon’s eyes to the glaring security risks in the Sahel, the ecological transition zone between the Sahara and the savannah that traditionally has fallen in France’s sphere of influence. Putting aside their Cold War rivalry in the region, Paris and Washington began working together more closely in sub-Saharan Africa.
Resistance From Washington
The Trump administration, however, may set a limit on the partnership. For months Washington has oscillated between wariness and hostility at the prospect of backing the Sahel joint force, a counterterrorism effort made up of battalions from Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania and Niger. Though Trump has pledged $60 million to the project, he has also indicated his displeasure with funding multinational efforts. France, which has devoted considerable resources to help establish the force since President Emmanuel Macron came to power, is getting frustrated with the lack of financial and political support from the United States. During a trip to Washington in mid-October, the French defense minister reportedly asked the United States to increase its assistance for the Sahel joint force, stating that Paris was looking for a long-term strategy to ease its security burden in the region.
Trump’s distaste for funding programs such as U.N. peacekeeping missions, combined with the reports that the Pentagon wants to increase its activities in Africa, makes for an interesting contradiction. Nevertheless, the current administration is unlikely to break with its predecessors’ policies, which tried to minimize U.S. military action in favor of local solutions. Senior officials in the U.S. armed forces overwhelmingly agree on the need to keep investing in local partnerships, even as Trump pushes for more aggressive action against militant groups around the world. Considering that the Sahel — a region whose vast, isolated terrain falls largely under the governance of poor, weak states — will struggle indefinitely with instability, maintaining this strategy is essential. Increased activity in sub-Saharan Africa, moreover, comes with unavoidable risks for U.S. policymakers.
To strengthen forces in Niger, for example, U.S. service members will have to accompany their local counterparts on potentially dangerous missions, much as they have in Somalia. And the inherent environmental and logistical challenges that await them in the desolate lands of the Sahel will raise the odds of complications or casualties.
The rise of terrorism has driven home the reality that the United States can’t afford to disregard sub-Saharan Africa. Though the continent has long been low on Washington’s list of priorities, the recent proliferation of militant groups in the Sahel offers a stark reminder that the United States ignores the region at its own peril.
Source: Stratfor is the world’s leading geo-political intelligence platform based in Washington DC
Following overdue elections, the National Electoral Commission known as CENI in the Democratic Republic of Congo has announced that the process will now take place in December, 2018.
In welcoming the decision, the U.S. State Department says “the DRC has taken a significant step toward realizing its first peaceful, democratic transfer of power. It is now incumbent on the CENI, the government, opposition party leaders, civil society organizations, and the people of the DRC to work together to ensure that the electoral deadlines published by the CENI are respected, and that all actions and statements remain within the framework of the DRC constitution and the December 2016 St. Sylvestre Agreement.”
In a press statement issued on Tuesday in Washington DC. and copied to West African Journal Magazine, the Trump Administration noted the “importance of President Kabila abiding by the DRC’s constitution, reaffirmed in the St. Sylvestre accord, that he will not seek a third term and will step down following elections.”
The U.S. State Department noted ” the urgent need for the DRC government to implement the confidence building measures included in the December Agreement. This includes an end to politically motivated prosecutions, the release of political prisoners, and respect for the right of peaceful assembly and association, so that opposition parties and civil society organizations may hold peaceful public meetings without government interference or intimidation.”
Citing long running violence and logistical issues in the Kasai region, the electoral body said it was impossible to hold elections in the area. The DRC led by President Joseph Kabila has seen an upsurge in protest and violence since his the expiration of his second full term in December , 2016.
Attempts to change the constitution to allow Kabila to continue in office have been met with violent citizens protests in which some people have died.
The United States says it “is committed to working with the people and institutions of the DRC, the African Union, regional and international partners, and the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) to ensure that the estimated 45 million Congolese voters are able to cast their ballots on time and as scheduled in December 2018.”
Prominent Liberian lawyer and human rights activist Mr. Samuel Kofi Woods recently served as keynote speaker at the installation of officers of the National Labor Center in Monrovia.
As part of its community service, West African Journal Magazine is publishing a copy of the speech.
KEYNOTE ADDRESS DELIVERED BY
SAMUEL KOFI WOODS, II
LEGAL CONSULTANT– LIBERIA LAW SOCIETY
ON THE OCCASION OF THE INSTALLATION OF
THE LEADERSHIP OF THE NATIONAL LABOR CENTER
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2017
Mr. President –elect and Officers of THE National Labor Center
Officials of Government
Official and members of Affiliating Unions
Ladies and Gentlemen
People of Liberia
The last time I had an opportunity to speak at the installation of leaders of an organization was few months ago when I interacted with the Female Lawyers of Liberia (AFELL). During that program, I stated clearly and maintain the same view today that Liberia is plagued with the scourge of a Leadership Deficit. I hold that to be true then and do so now. The Liberian Government condemned my statement and I came under personal attacks from their operatives. Ideas and opinions must be contested to prevail.
I was clear in my vision and thought and today there’s ample evidence to prove that there’s no Elders in our land. Liberians tend to give the impression that it is a liability or crime to work in government and no one can leave government without the scar of corruption and theft. There is also a view that when you served in government you must never comment on any issue affecting our people. I have a different view. We must serve our government because in service to government we perform the highest moral responsibility. However, this must be done with the highest degree of commitment and integrity. Government is often seen as the center for exploitation and ill-gotten wealth. Hence, people’s desperation is not to serve but to acquire wealth at the sufferings and agony of our people. This is also true for our various organizations. Our reference to leadership deficit is not limited to the Presidency but all levels of society: our family, religious institutions, professional bodies, etc.
I served in two capacities in government and I challenge all and sundry about my stewardship. I am on record as the only living Minister whose term at the Ministry of Public Works was audited twice and yet stand tall without any scar of abuse of the public trust. I still live in Liberia and await any judicial process to question my stewardship. I have the patience and time not to be confronted by gossips and rumors but facts and evidence that can be contested in the proper forum deemed by law. When I realized that there was a contest to my conviction, I voluntarily resigned. I was not forced to resing and resignation was not a compromise for anything.
However, our work was not completed and we had to move on because in said capacity we work at the will and pleasure of the President. I come back to you today as a true friend and ally of the workers’ movement. As you seek to organize rather than agonize. I come to join you in this endeavor.
As a friend and ally, speaking to you and the public can be a interesting undertaking because I do so from my heart guided by the deep conviction, love for my country and the passion I hold for justice and respect for human dignity.
My Dear Friends, Workers are the engines of production, of the economy of any society. Workers produce the goods, provide the services, deliver the goods to the market place and even manage the market place. No country will survive without a workforce. Workers, thus, have a potential reach and impact that is greater and far-reaching to improve the social and economic conditions of our nations. Yet in Liberia, workers remain one of the most downtrodden and abused.
Workers are paid less, made to work under slave-like conditions, are not given health care or insurance benefits and often do not have a voice in the decisions that affect them. On the economic front, people depend on work to fulfill their need for income to better their lives and the lives of their families, to escape poverty, ignorance and disease, enjoy recreation and achieve status. Work also involves the production or creation of things that make life better and more fulfilling.
This is why we insisted on the need to review our labor laws and provide decency in the work place. This is why social dialogue among workers, government and employers remain a viable vehicle for progress.
It is my thesis that workers in Liberia continue to suffer the wrath of poverty and treated with a large measure of disdain because we have failed to organize, because we have refused to come together into strong labor movements rather than small, briefcase labor organizations. We cannot have the force and effect necessary to transform the sector and make workers proud if we do not unite and organize
No government however responsive, no minister however patriotic can offer you the dignity you deserve. It is by organizing and building institutions larger than yourself and your ego that will provide you the freedom and dignity you deserve.
Until you organize ourselves, until you focus on building strong union federations and strong solidarities, your real potentials cannot be realized. It is only when we organize that we are able to build power and to change our conditions.
The relationship between capital and labor, i.e., employers and workers, is an inherently adversarial. The primary motivation of employers in operating their businesses/firms is to maximize profits. And to do so, they are inclined to want to spend less on labor cost, on safety and health in the workplace, on protecting the communities and the environment, on providing education and healthcare, etc. This means that they will want to pay you less, not provide you with healthcare, and with workplaces that are safe and healthy. The explosion in LAC — in which six individuals/workers were reportedly killed because the company refused to invest in safety in their factory, is a classic example.
LAC, according to the government’s investigation in the explosion incident, reconfigured a rubber processing equipment so as to speed up production, knowing that an explosion could result. LAC also failed to implement basic safety standards such as having marked emergency exits. As a result, six workers were killed. In other places, LAC would have paid millions to workers but in Liberia with reports of allegations of government’s complicity, workers disorganization and community intimidation, LAC did not pay its full share. An organized and strong workers union would have advocated for more than what LAC offered.
Workers want to be paid well for their labor; not only do they want a bigger share in the products of their labor (Ehrenberg & Smith, 2015) they also want their workplaces to be healthy and safe; they want a voice in the decisions that affect them, as human beings, not as tools or instruments. Workers also want work to contribute to the social advancement of their communities.
When we organize, we build power and we put ourselves in a better position to get what we want. A renowned union organizer once defined a union as a group of workers coming together to use their power in numbers to make their employer to do what the employer would otherwise not do. If we agree that organizing gives us power then it is a no brainer that WE MUST ORGANIZE, for our economic survival, the preservation of our dignity as human beings, our health and safety on the job. Our future depends on organizing.
If we fail to organize we are doing our families and ourselves a dis-service. We will be unable to engage in collective bargaining, to strike or to engage in other forms of mutual aid and, consequently we will not be able to get the economic and social benefits- the pay, the healthcare, the right working conditions, and the dignity and respect that we deserve.
As some of you may have already experienced, when workers stand-alone and approach their employers as individuals they are less likely to achieve what they want and the employer succeeds. Organizing gives workers social cohesion, group support and mutual defense and protection.
Beyond being concerned with workplace issues, unions are important civil society organizations. Sociologists break the term “society” down into a number of different overlapping spheres of social processes in which people interact and cooperate for various purposes. I will briefly talk about three of those spheres, namely the economy, the state, and civil society. The economy is the sphere in which we produce and buy things. The state is the sphere in which we govern our collective affairs, and the civil society is the sphere is which we get together voluntarily in organizations to pursue common purposes.
Workers are, or can be very important players in all of these spheres. In the economic sphere workers produce the goods and services; in the state, workers are citizens who are involved in the governance of our collective affairs, and in the civil society sphere workers, when organized, are empowered, not only to pursue, but are able to achieve their common purposes.
Accordingly, sociologists place labor unions, the combinations that workers form when they organize, in the realm of civil society organizations defined as the collective associations that people form based on shared interests and solidarity and rooted in shared gains and shared sacrifices. As civil society organizations labor unions can play a very important role in attacking the inequalities, crime and corruption that have sadly taken over our country today.
Unfortunately, Labor Unions themselves have fallen prey to this pervasive menace. Labor unions should challenge, organize and vote against corrupt politicians, they can insist on the equitable distribution of the national wealth, they can promote education and healthcare for all and they can insist on justice, accountability and the rule of law; essentially they can create a social justice movement and become a force for change.
Democracy simply means rule or governance by the people. But when citizens choose to live their lives as separate, discrete individuals, going their separate ways, acting exclusively as self-contained, self-interested individual persons, then the idea of democracy as “rule by the people” will not become a reality. People may vote in elections – although even for that, many people will ask themselves “why bother since my vote isn’t going to make a difference?” – but beyond voting they will do little to create a “will of the people”, let alone help to actually translate that “will” into real power.
History teaches us that whenever people organize, they are stronger and have been able to accomplish their goals. The contrast to that is, when people refuse to organize or to stand together, they often perish.
Democratic societies bestow upon citizens some basic civil liberties such as freedom of association and speech which must be fully upheld and practiced without hindrance. Labor unions play a pivotal role in upholding and protecting these rights and serve as incubators of democracy by building solidarities that promote democratic engagement.
In this politically charged election period in our country, the role of organizing and of the labor movement in politics could not be more relevant. The relationship between union, economic and political interests is undeniable and this is the motivating factor for union engagement in politics. Labor’s participation in politics is indispensable to the survival and progress of the labor movement. Through engagement in politics unions have not only been able to win benefits for their members, but also to protect their very essence and existence. This is why I have an issue with Article 81 & 82, which tends to exclude labor unions from canvassing directly or indirectly and making contributions to political parties. A better interpretation and/or amendment will have to be sought in the future.
An officer of the United Food and Commercial Workers based in the United States made the case more cogently when he described union organizing, collective bargaining and political participation as “three legs of a stool”, arguing “politics affect our ability to organize, and to be successful in collective bargaining… and if we cannot organize, it is harder to protect our numbers.
When unions engage in politics one of their objectives is to pressure government to enact legislation or support policies that would lead to better wages and benefits, shorter work hours, job security, among others. As taxpayers (contributors to the public coffers) and as voters, those who decide who holds public office, unions hold tremendous political power and influence over the decisions and actions of government and government officials.
Labor’s organizing and engagement in politics have been critical to building democratic societies, to winning civil and human rights guarantees for oppressed groups, and to transforming the overall social, economic and political structures, policies and programs in various countries.
Unions’ political participation dates back to the early labor movements and has its roots in the conditions that necessitated unions in the first place; the very abuses those workers, their families and communities face in Liberia today. In as early as 1878, the founder of the Noble Order of the Knights of Labor, Uriah Stephens, made the following point regarding union political engagement. “All the evils that labor rests upon are matters of law and are to be removed by legislation….Is the eight-hour law, or prison labor, or universal education, or child and female labor or the machinery question or land and landless….political questions? Can you discuss the interest of labor in any manner without running into political economy….Our order is not a political one… but we must in a fraternal manner discuss the economics of our condition….shall monopolists have politics all to themselves?” Urias’ comment laid a foundation for labor’s engagement in politics.
The Workingmen’s parties, one of the earliest labor movements also pursued a social, political agenda, one directed at creating a more democratic and socially just society.
Another early labor movement, the Knights of Labor, believed that the best way to address the problems of wages and benefits of union members was to seek the institution of broad reforms in society. As far as the Knights were concerned, the control that employers exercised over employees in the workplace as well as the problems of low wages and unsafe working conditions were traceable to the economic and political policies and structures of society (James, 1954, p. 75). Accordingly, the Knights contended that the best way to address those problems was to tackle the very societal structures, which constituted the basis for those problems (Nicholson, 2004).
The American Federation of Labor (AFL) played a critical role in the passage of the Wagner Act, known as the American labor movement’s Magna Carta, in 1935 and the played an important role in furthering the cause of civil rights, anti- poverty and social welfare programs. CIO leaders provided political and material support to the civil rights movement and collaborated with Civil Rights leaders in demanding the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The South African labor movement was very instrumental in ending Apartheid and instituting democracy in South Africa. And after the institution of democracy in South Africa the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) the largest trade union federation in South Africa was very instrumental in winning pro-worker legislation, such as the NEDLAC legislation that provided for the establishment of a joint commission of trade unions, government, employers, and civic organizations known as NEDLAC, the National Economic Development and Labor Council.
The Nigerian labor union movement was launched as part of the anti-colonial movement for independence from Great Britain. Nigerian labor unions, as a result of their liberation agenda, exercised significant power in the liberation struggle and the political discourse of the country. The militancy of Nigerian labor unions accelerated the attainment of independence.
Liberian Workers, Our National Federation Where are you in all this? Liberia has reached a checkpoint not a crossroad. We have seen institutionalization of violence and the criminalization of the state in Liberia. We have seen state plundering and the bastardization of our institutions for personal gains. We have seen evil lurking in the shadows of our politics. If you don’t organize and become strong, your future and the future of our people will be in jeopardy.
I live and act as a human rights lawyer. In this public manner, I would like to publicly condemn the arson attack on the home of journalist Smith Toby; the intimidating tactics meted out at Henry Costa and the regular reports for scare tactics and intimidation allegedly being employed in the political environment. This must not be allowed to go unchecked. These cowards like Ku Klux Klan (KKK) members use the cover of darkness to hatch and implement evil in our society. This creeping menace is a threat to our democracy. An attack on any Liberian must be an attack on all of us. There must be no conspiracy of silence and Liberians will not be cowed into fear. We have a history of fighting tyranny. Where ever and from whosoever it rears its ugly head, we must fight it peacefully. I certainly may not agree with Journalist Smith Toby neither do I agree with what Costa may have said or continue to say but we must collectively defend their rights to say what they want to say. There are also allegations that political appointees and civil servants face intimidation and threats of dismissals due to political affiliations. This is wrong. If it is due to the violation of the law then it must be equally applied without discrimination. In this our collective liberties will be guaranteed and enhanced.
Over the years, we have failed to build strong and viable institutions because we continue to glorify personalities. Our political, social and economic institutions have become small cartels of motley individuals whose sole purpose is to exploit our people and abuse their innocence. Our problem is being compounded by new elements of tribal and group affiliations rather than the quality and value of character. Honest men and women have become enemies of the state.
Here lies the Liberian Problem and here lies the problem of organized labor in Liberia. This new leadership must seek redemption and offer labor what it deserves. Union dues collection is not the sole purpose of unions. We must work to educate workers and fight for the working class. They are at perils. Deep in our plantations, in our factories, in our homes, in our workplaces lies the unending specter of slavery and servitude.
Our nation has been reduced to young and old zombies looking for direction in a directionless abyss of hopelessness yet people think they can find salvation in a wrecked political order but not in sound collective action and decisions.
No leader how patriotic will save our country individually. It will be our collective will to reform, love for one another and love for country. Educated people and intellectuals did not fail Liberia. It is greedy and selfish individuals who did. Educated or not if you have no values, no integrity and no love for country, it will make no difference. The value we place on materialism and wealth corrupts us and denies our nation of what it deserves.
Our youths have been abused on the battlefield: fought as child soldier. They have become adults without hope and purpose and now you say to them and their children that they don’t need education to compete. You are deceiving them with this slogan while you keep your kids abroad in good schools receiving education to qualify them so they return and govern and continue to abuse them.
As a kid, my mother who did not finish high school or obtained a masters’ degree advised me that my key to success was something called EDUCATION. I listened to her. As an educated man, I have been able to traverse the world and compete on the basis of ideas not might. I have been able to interact with people far and near. I have listened to others even when we disagree and not bully, intimidate or brutalize them. My world is not limited. I must therefore speak for myself.
As an educated man, I have not failed Liberia. I have made Liberia proud like many of my compatriots. Let nobody fool you. Education is good. This is why some of our children are abroad where they enjoy good education, health care and an environment where they can be anybody they want to be. Those who want to be leaders must now set good examples. If you want to be our leaders, bring your families home and let us collectively endure the messy educational system, broken health system and twisted value-system like our compatriots. Let us join and fix them together.
We did not develop this policy in the past but the lessons learnt require that we adopt a policy that requires those who serve in appointed positions confirmed by our senate to bring their families home.
We need to tell our people how salaries will be re-structured and how waste in government will be addressed to invest more in education. We must not discourage their aspirations to liberate themselves.
We must teach our children that the new Liberia depends on them and we must all be ready to develop it together. Let us help them understand that education is not the problem. The problem lies in our selfishness, our envy, our innate greed and our blind and inordinate ambition. We must not abuse their gullibility because of our ambition. We must tell them how we will improve our education and health systems to guarantee that they can work and live in dignity: put bread on their own table and care for themselves.
After years of illusive peace, tenuous transitional justice (the Truth and Reconciliation process) and cosmetic national reconciliation, our attempt to consolidate our democratic credentials is under threat because we failed to properly reform our institutions. We undermined our institutions and compromised them. We used them for personal rather than collective ends.
Our nation’s pride is once more under scrutiny, as international interlocutors must now come to our aid. They must tell our President to stay out and stop interfering in elections. They must dialogue with political parties to stabilize our elections. We cannot continue to be a problem child. We must grow up and become responsible adults taking care of each other and building our nation.
Our hope ultimately lies in our judiciary, which must now redeem our country. God give us men and women whose integrity will be unblemished, whose love for nation will be tested and whose faith in you will lead them to give purpose and meaning of their existence. All of us must respect the rule of law. The pursuit of no man’s ambition is worth a drop of human blood.
Dear Friends and compatriots, the complexities our nation face will not require cosmetic solutions. It requires radical and deliberate attempts to fulfill the ideals of nationhood. It will lie in a responsible leadership not led by those in the shadows.
Organized labor must demand from those who want to lead us to provide an agenda for workers. You must not agonize but organize. You must seek redemption and change. In this you must built strong institutions and develop an agenda to liberate the million of workers in our country. You must be transparent, accountable and inspire. YOU WILL NOT BE BETTER OFF IF YOU CANNOT WORK FOR THE DIGNITY OF ALL.
SOLIDARITY FOREVER! SOLIDARITY FOREVER! SOLIDARITY FOREVER! FOR THE UNION MAKES US STRONG!
I THANK YOU
Disclaimer: The views expressed are solely that of the author and are not necessarily shared by West African Journal Magazine.
Liberian beneficiaries of Deferred Enforced Departure also known as DED in the United States may have reason to be apprehensive about their own future given the decision of the Trump Administration to end Temporary Protective Status (TPS) for thousands of citizens from Central America and Haiti.
It can be recalled that the current TPS designation for Liberians was extended by President Barack Obama but now expires on March 18, 2017.
In a memorandum issued on September 16, 2016 to then Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, President Obama directed him “to extend for an additional 18 months the deferred enforced departure (DED) of certain Liberians and to provide for work authorization during that period.”
According to the Memorandum, “Pursuant to his constitutional authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States, President Obama has determined that there are compelling foreign policy reasons to again extend Deferred Enforced Departure (“DED”) to Liberian nationals who are currently residing in the United States under the existing grant of DED. The President accordingly directed that Liberian nationals (and eligible persons without nationality who last resided in Liberia) who are physically present in the United States, have continuously resided in the United States since October 1, 2002, and who remain eligible for DED through September 30, 2016, be provided DED for an additional 18-month period. See Presidential Memorandum—Deferred Enforced Departure for Liberians, September 28, 2016 (“Presidential Memorandum”).
Note that only individuals who held Temporary Protected Status (TPS) on September 30, 2007, the date that a former TPS designation of Liberia terminated, are eligible for DED, provided they have continued to meet all other eligibility criteria established by the President. The President also directed the Secretary to implement the necessary steps to authorize employment authorization for eligible Liberians for 18 months, from October 1, 2016 through March 31, 2018.
According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), “Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is a provisional immigration status granted to eligible nationals of designated countries suffering the effects of an ongoing armed conflict, environmental disaster, or other extraordinary and temporary conditions. During the period for which the Secretary of Homeland Security has designated a country under the TPS program, beneficiaries are not required to leave the United States and may obtain employment authorization.
TPS does not lead to permanent resident status, however, when the Secretary terminates a country’s designation, the alien will return to the status he/she had prior to TPS or to any other status he/she may have obtained while registered for TPS.”
In the case of Liberia, since 1991 the U.S. granted TPS to thousands of Liberians citizens who fled the brutal civil war.
Liberians in the U.S. benefitted from a series of extensions to their initial TPS designation until expiration on September 28, 1999 based on a determination of the then U.S. Attorney General the late Janet Reno who stated that “Based upon a more recent review of conditions within Liberia by the Departments of Justice and State, the Attorney General finds that conditions no longer support a TPS designation. A Department of State memorandum concerning Liberia states that “[t]he divisive civil war in Liberia which began in 1990 ended with the Abuja Peace Accords in 1996. Since 1997, the country in general has not experienced ongoing armed conflict. In September 1998, violence erupted suddenly in Monrovia. * * * Since then, however, no further general conflict has occurred.” The memorandum also states that “Although conditions in Liberia remain difficult, the overall situation is not sufficiently adverse to prevent most Liberian nationals in the U.S. from returning to Liberia in safety.” It concludes, “The Department of State finds that sufficient grounds to recommend a further extension of TPS for Liberia do not exist. We therefore recommend that TPS for Liberia be terminated on its current expiration date of September 28, 1999.”
Following the expiration of TPS designation for Liberians, then President Bill Clinton, made the determination that for “foreign policy reasons, protection from removal should be extended for a year after that date.” Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) status was extended to Liberians and subsequently extended. The last extension was issued in September, 2016 by President Obama and expires in March, 2018.
According to the DHS, DED is similar to TPS in that it allows aliens of a particular nationality to remain and work in the United States without the threat of deportation. The President issues a DED directive based on his constitutional authority related to foreign policy, whereas the Attorney General has statutory authority to designate a country for TPS.
Apprehension amongst Liberian DED beneficiaries was heightened late on Friday, November 3, when the Washington Post reported that on last Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on last Tuesday, dispatched a a letter to acting DHS Secretary Elaine Duke informing her that for over 300,00 nationals of Central America and Haiti, conditions which had been used to justify their Temporary Protective Status in the U.S. no longer existed to warrant the continuation of this designation and protection.
Many of the Central American and Haitian migrants, in addition to their TPS status were allowed to live and work in the U.S.
Reports say scores of Central American and Haitian nationals, in anticipation of the revocation of their TPS status have been making their way north through unofficial border crossings to seek sanctuary in Canada.
Liberian activists and some members of the U.S. Congress have been lobbying the new Trump Administration to continue the extension of DED designation upon expiration in March of next year. However, the Trump Administration has shown no inclination to further extension and protection. Any cue from the new US government can be found in its latest decision to terminate protection of Central American and Haitian nationals when protections end early next year. Another indication of the leaning of the U.S. Government was its decision to terminate the 2014 – 2016 Ebola-related TPS designation in May of this year for some nationals of Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea.
Many Liberians on DED have put down roots, held long term jobs, purchased homes and businesses and have children and grand children who are American citizens. If DED status is revoked for these Liberian nationals, individuals with no other lawful immigration status on March 19, 2018, will no longer be protected from removal or eligible for employment authorization in the U.S.
Gambia’s Minister of the Interior says about 165 nationals have voluntarily returned home from the north African nation of Libya.
Minister Mai Ahmad Fatty disclosed that the batch of Gambians returned home on Thursday.
Gambian returnees now total 1,467, the Interior Minister said.
Earlier this year, another group of Gambian migrants returned home.
Scores of Gambians often leave home to attempt the perilous journey to Europe and other parts of the world because of tough economic conditions back home.
Help is being provided to resettle and re-integrate the returnees, the Interior Minister said.
Africanews. reports that the Gambian government, has, meantime, has entered a deal with the European Union in the area of irregular migration. Interior Minister Mai Ahmad Fatty signed the 3.9m euro deal on behalf of the government.